4 Reasons To Buy A Condo… And 4 Reasons Not To

If you’re buying your first place, moving to a city where high density is the deal, or perhaps moving down and looking for more of a lock-and-leave lifestyle, a condo probably seems like a good bet. And, for many, it is. But is it really right for you?

Condo living is a commitment – to close quarters with your neighbors, to elevator rides to walk the dog if you’re in a high rise, to muddled voice and footsteps from above if you don’t have great insulation. Which might all be a worthy tradeoff for letting someone else handle the maintenance and being able to go from renter to owner. Want to see if condo living is for you? Read on.

4 Reasons TO Buy a Condo

1. It’s less expensive than a house

One of the main draws of condo living is the affordability. Of course, that’s relative to the area, the square footage of the unit, the desirability, and a number of other factors.

“Obviously, the cost of a condo versus a house depends on the size of the home, the property values of the neighborhood and the cost of living in the area,” said US News. “But typically, you’ll spend less on a condo, ‘especially in higher-cost markets where condos can be the only alternative to high-priced, single-family homes,'” says Amy Tierce, a regional vice president with Wintrust Mortgage in Needham, Massachusetts.”

2. Lower maintenance

If you don’t want to have to water the flowers or mow the lawn, condo living can offer a distinct advantage. You generally won’t have outdoor space to worry about unless you purchase a detached condo, and, in most cases, the Homeowner’s Association takes care of any exterior and common area maintenance, including any landscaping in the front of your place.

“For busy home owners, not having to actually deal with the upkeep and looks of their home can be a very good thing,” said Street Directory. “You have the benefits of home ownership, without all the responsibilities that go along with owning property.”

3. It’s all yours

Yes, some condos can feel apartment-like. But it’ll feel much more like a home once you’ve put your personal spin on it. Your landlord may not have let you paint or change out fixtures, but in your own place, you’re only limited by your imagination – and your budget.

4. For the amenities

You may be looking at luxury hotel-like condos that offer a fitness center, doorman, or valet (or all of the above). Or perhaps you’d prefer a large pool, sundeck, and clubhouse. Amenities that are standard in many condos offer buyers the opportunity to enjoy a taste of the resort lifestyle—something they probably wouldn’t find in a single-family neighborhood.

4 Reasons NOT to Buy

1. Traditionally, condos appreciate more slowly than singe-family homes

Real estate buyers aren’t typically drawn to places that don’t offer a great value. But condos may not compare to single-family homes when it comes to building equity.

“Condominiums often appreciate in value much slower than single-family homes,” said Money Crashers. “This is because you don’t own any land, which is the biggest driver for appreciation. Instead, you only own the living space. There’s a big difference.”

2. Common walls

Have kids, dogs, a loud voice, or a late-night TV obsession? You may bug your neighbor to the point that it’s uncomfortable for you both to live there. Or, they may bug you! If you’re worried about common walls, do your research:

  • Listen up – Ask your Realtor to schedule a visit during the dinner hour or on a weekend so you can get a good feel for the noise and activity level
  • Ask around – The neighbors should be honest about the living conditions
  • Inquire within – If it’s a newer community, you may be able to find out from the builder if the insulation is upgraded to your standards

3. You want a yard

You might be able to find a pocket of grass and a mini patio, but if you’re looking for ample outdoor space, single-family is the way to go.

4. It might actually be more expensive

With a condo, you may have higher interest rates depending on your loan, plus monthly HOA fees that can be hundreds of dollars. And, US News warns to beware of condos that don’t have their finances in order.

“Some condos are underfunded and therefore have no money in reserves to pay for capital improvements such as concrete and wood repair, painting or roofing,” they said. That could create a situation where each of the owners is assessed to pay for the repairs.

courtesy of:  http://realtytimes.com/consumeradvice/

U.S. Single-Family Starts Hit 6-1/2 Year High in Dec

U.S. housing starts rose more than expected in December as groundbreaking for single-family homes hit its highest level in more than 6-1/2 years, in a hopeful sign for the sluggish housing market recovery.

Starts increased 4.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 1.09 million units, the Commerce Department said on Wednesday … starts

For all of 2014, groundbreaking increased 8.8 percent to 1.01 million units, the highest since 2007 …

Single-family homes starts, the largest part of the market, jumped 7.2 percent to a 728,000-unit pace, the highest level since March 2008. Groundbreaking on single-family projects in the West hit a seven-year high, while starts in the Midwest were the highest since December 2011.

read more —>  http://www.cnbc.com/id/102352190

Single-Family Housing Poised to Take Off in 2015

A growing economy, rising household formations, low mortgage rates, and pent-up demand will help single-family housing production rev up in 2015, while a growth in renters will keep the multifamily market at cruising altitude or higher, according to economists who participated in the latest National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) 2014 Fall Construction Forecast.

NAHB is forecasting 991,000 total housing starts in 2014, up 6.6 percent from 930,000 units last year.

Single-family production is expected to rise 2.5 percent this year to 637,000 units, increase an additional 26 percent next year to 802,000, and reach 1.1 million in 2016.

Setting the 2000-2003 period as a benchmark for normal housing activity when single-family production averaged 1.3 million units annually, single-family starts are expected to steadily rise from 48 percent of what is considered a typical market in the third quarter of 2014 to 90 percent of normal by the fourth quarter of 2016.   More info —> 

courtesy of:  http://www.nahb.org/

Smoke Alarm Laws for Residential Properties

Smoke alarms approved by the State Fire Marshal are required to be placed in all residential properties in California. The State Fire Marshal lists all approved smoke alarms. [Calif. Health & Safety Code §13113.7]

Beginning July 1, 2014, the State Fire Marshal will require all battery-operated smoke alarms to contain a non-replaceable battery that lasts at least ten years. [Health & S C §13114(b)]

Beginning January 1, 2015, the State Fire Marshal will require all smoke alarms (battery-powered, or powered by electricity) to:

  • display the date of manufacture;
  • provide a place where the date of installation can be written; and
  • incorporate a hush feature.

Does this mean all the existing smoke alarms need to be replaced to meet these new alarm requirements? No. Operable hardwired and battery-operated smoke alarms which were approved and listed when they were installed don’t need to be replaced immediately. [Health & S C §§13113.7(a)(4); 13113.7(d)(3)] …

When an existing smoke alarm no longer works, the replacement smoke alarm is to meet all new requirements. For example, a battery-powered smoke alarm installed on July 2, 2014 is required to have the non-replaceable ten-year battery, but is not required to display the date of manufacture …

Smoke alarms are not required if a State Fire Marshal-approved fire alarm system with smoke detectors is installed on the property. An existing fire sprinkler system no longer exempts a residential property owner from smoke alarm installation requirements. [Health & S C §13113.7(a)(5)]

Violations of smoke alarm rules incur a maximum fine of $200 for each offense. [Health & S C §13113.7(e)]

Smoke alarm rules for rentals

If your client owns a multi-unit residential property or a single family residence (SFR) rental property, they are required to install, maintain and test smoke alarms on their property. [Health & S C §13113.7(d)(2)]

Owners (or property managers, as owners’ agents) are required to ensure smoke alarms are operable when a new tenancy is created. [Health & S C §13113.7(d)(2)(B)]

To ensure safe conditions, residential rental and lease agreement forms include a provision requiring the landlord to comply with all safety ordinance and regulations, including smoke alarm law …

However, tenants are responsible for notifying the owner or property manager if the smoke alarm becomes inoperable.The owner is not in violation of smoke alarm requirements if they are unaware of a malfunction in the smoke alarm after the tenant is given possession. [Health & S C §13113.7(d)(2)(B)]

An owner responds to a tenant’s notification of an inoperable smoke alarm in their unit by correcting the defect. 24-hour written notice is given to the tenant before the owner or their agent enters and performs the repairs. Repairs are performed only during business hours. [Health & S C §13113.7(d)(2) …

Additionally, beginning January 1, 2016 owners of any residential rental property are to install additional smoke alarms to ensure devices are located in accordance with current local building standards. [Health & S C §13113.7(d)(3)]

In California, smoke alarms are to be installed on each floor and in each sleeping room. Proper smoke alarm placement also depends on local ordinance. [Calif. Building Code §310.9]

The recent law changes do not mandate the frequency of owner inspections. However, landlords have a duty to inspect the premises upon entry for any purpose. Inspections need not be thorough, but landlords are liable for any dangerous condition that is observable by a reasonable person. [Mora v. Baker Commodities, Inc. (1989) 210 CA3d 771]

Thus, if a smoke alarm defect can be reasonably ascertained visually during a landlord’s visit to the unit, the landlord needs to repair or replace the device.

Enforcement on a building permit

Additionally, smoke alarm enforcement is triggered when a residential property owner seeks a building permit for alterations, repairs or additions costing more than $1,000. Building permits will not be issued until the owner has provided proof that State Fire Marshal-approved smoke alarms are in place and operable. [Health & S C §13113.7(a)(2)]

This does not require the owner to replace any older, operating smoke alarms, but older smoke alarms are required to have been approved by the State Fire Marshal at the time of installation. [Health & S C §13113.7(a)(4)]

Enforcement on a transfer of a single family residence

Enforcement of smoke alarm rules is also triggered on the transfer of a single family residence (SFR). Sellers certify the property is in compliance with smoke alarm rules on the Transfer Disclosure Statement (TDS). The certification — TDS — is handed to the buyer as soon as practicable (ASAP) before the seller enters into a purchase agreement or counteroffer.

read more at:  http://journal.firsttuesday.us/clearing-up-smoke-alarm-laws-for-residential-properties/36486/